Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add node_pool to arohcp #1017

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ahitacat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Alba Hita Catala <[email protected]>
@ahitacat ahitacat force-pushed the add-nodepool-arohcp branch from 14668c8 to 8b93cdb Compare January 30, 2025 13:12

// Deletes the node pool.
method Delete {
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets keep this with Get only and add methods later.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahitacat ahitacat Feb 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I resolved this, but I think it is not needed to remove the rest of the methods. We can hold this PR until we have the endpoints ready.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good.

@zgalor
Copy link
Collaborator

zgalor commented Feb 2, 2025

don't we also need to fix the reference in the cluster resource?

@nimrodshn
Copy link
Contributor

nimrodshn commented Feb 2, 2025

don't we also need to fix the reference in the cluster resource?

@zgalor

No. the compiler knows how to find it if it exists in its service. [e.g. /aro_hcp/v1alpha1]

@ahitacat ahitacat marked this pull request as draft February 3, 2025 09:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants